Appvisum AppVisum.Sys → 0.2 Beta

Comments and changes to this ticket

• 

  Alxandr March 11th, 2010 @ 02:40 PM

  • Tag set to “providerfactory”

  [bulk edit]

• 

  Alxandr March 12th, 2010 @ 12:16 PM

  • State changed from “new” to “open”
  • Assigned user set to “Alxandr”

  I've thought about this for a while and come up with a solution witch I think might be the best suitable one. If every provider where to extend a ProviderBase abstract class, and that class required attributes for name and description, and in time also could provide means for other things the system could easily be extended by extending that base class. The only problem would be that every time the base class is extended every class that extends it would need to override the new methods if they are bodyless.

  Still, I think this is the best approach.

• 

  Alxandr March 15th, 2010 @ 04:32 AM

  (from [9718fc6ddfc41c418c7ecff7687a6f66f33e988e]) Started working on [#3] http://github.com/Alxandr/AppVisum.Sys/commit/9718fc6ddfc41c418c7ec...

• 

  Alxandr March 15th, 2010 @ 04:32 AM

  • State changed from “open” to “resolved”

  (from [391e1801fadd287ba8899aababe584252e31fa96]) Major rewrite and added a couple of classes to make the project easier to understand and maintain. Also added support for naming providers and adding documentation for them. ProviderFactory will no longer support several providers with the same name. The new ProviderFactory also requires every Provider to be instansiated, and does this to be able to compare names of the providers. Changes is yet to be documentated (as well as the new classes).

  [#3 state:resolved] http://github.com/Alxandr/AppVisum.Sys/commit/391e1801fadd287ba8899...